|
Menú
  • Revistas
  • Quiénes somos
  • Proceso editorial
Revistas
Quiénes somos
Proceso editorial
  • Registrarse
  • Entrar
  • |
    es
    en English pt_PT Português
    MLSPM

    Patrocinado por:

    Logo Funiber
    Logo UNINI Logo UNEAT
    Logo UNIB Logo unincol
    Logo unidc Logo Romana
    Logo PM Logo UNEAT
    Logo UNINI
    Logo UNEAT
    Logo UNIB
    Logo unincol
    Logo unidc
    Logo Romana
    Logo PM
    • Actual
    • Archivos
    • Acerca de
      • Sobre la revista
      • Equipo editorial
      • Revisores
      • Estadísticas
    • Envíos
    • Indexación
    • Contacto

    Una revisión crítica del modelo de liderazgo del cambio de Kotter: Relevancia, limitaciones e integración con modelos contemporáneos

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.35992/22p0jr44

    Adolfo Carreño Sepúlveda

    Universidad de Salamanca ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3393-1584

    Formatos Disponibles

    PDF

    en

    Resumen

    Este artículo reexamina críticamente el modelo de ocho pasos de John Kotter para liderar el cambio organizacional, analizando su relevancia continua y sus limitaciones en el contexto del entorno empresarial actual, caracterizado por su dinamismo y orientación tecnológica. Aunque el marco de Kotter se ha convertido en una referencia fundamental en la formación de liderazgo y en la práctica de la gestión del cambio, su enfoque lineal y jerárquico enfrenta dificultades cuando se aplica a procesos de transformación continua que requieren agilidad, coordinación interfuncional y toma de decisiones descentralizada. Al contrastar el modelo de Kotter con enfoques contemporáneos como Agile, Lean y el liderazgo adaptativo, el análisis pone de relieve las áreas en las que dicho marco debe evolucionar para seguir siendo eficaz. El artículo se apoya tanto en la literatura académica como en marcos aplicados desarrollados por grandes firmas de consultoría para examinar cómo los principios de Kotter han sido incorporados, adaptados y ampliados en la práctica. Asimismo, explora las intersecciones teóricas entre el énfasis de Kotter en el liderazgo y paradigmas modernos como el liderazgo servicial, transformacional y adaptativo, argumentando que estos enfoques enriquecen el modelo original al promover la autoridad distribuida, el aprendizaje continuo y la capacidad de respuesta sistémica. Desde esta perspectiva actualizada, el estudio propone una visión híbrida del liderazgo del cambio que integra el proceso estructurado de Kotter con estrategias flexibles y centradas en las personas, con el fin de abordar las realidades actuales de la transformación empresarial. El resultado es una perspectiva matizada sobre cómo las organizaciones pueden lograr un cambio sostenible al equilibrar la disciplina estratégica con la capacidad de adaptación, preservando las fortalezas de la visión de Kotter y, al mismo tiempo, mejorando su aplicabilidad práctica.


    Descargas

    Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

    Estadísticas


    Cómo citar

    • ACM
    • ACS
    • APA
    • ABNT
    • Chicago
    • Harvard
    • IEEE
    • MLA
    • Turabian
    • Vancouver
    • AMA
    Una revisión crítica del modelo de liderazgo del cambio de Kotter: Relevancia, limitaciones e integración con modelos contemporáneos. (n.d.). MLS Project Design and Management , 7(2). https://doi.org/10.35992/22p0jr44
    EndNote Zotero Mendeley
    Descargar .ris
    EndNote
    Descargar .bib

    Citas

    Abumuhor, I. (2025). Leading through change: Strategies for adapting and overcoming challenges. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2025.04.012

    Accenture. (2024). Change reinvented: A new blueprint for continuous, meaningful, successful change. https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/accenture-com/document-2/Accenture-Change-Reinvented-Report.pdf

    Appelbaum, S. H., Habashy, S., Malo, J.-L., & Shafiq, H. (2012). Back to the future: Revisiting Kotter’s 1996 change model. Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211253231

    Azagury, J., & Close, K. (2024). Change reinvented: How organizations can rethink transformation for lasting impact. Accenture. https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/consulting/change-reinvented

    Basford, T., & Schaninger, B. (2016). The four building blocks of change. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-four-building-blocks--of-change

    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. The Free Press.

    Boston Consulting Group. (n.d.). Culture and change management. https://www.bcg.com/capabilities/organization-strategy/culture-change-management

    Burnes, B. (2017). Managing change (7th Ed.). Pearson.

    Burns, J. M. (2010). Leadership. Harper. (Original work published 1978)

    By, R. T. (2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010500359250

    Carreño, A. M. (2024). An analytical review of John Kotter's change leadership framework: A modern approach to sustainable organizational transformation [Working paper]. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5044428

    Deloitte. (2021). Change management playbook: Your key tools for driving change in a digital world. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone2/be/en/docs/industries/government-public-services/2023/deloitte-belgium-change-management-playbook.pdf

    Ellmer, K., Dhar, J., Weinstein, S., Chansler, C., Catchlove, P., & Currier, C. (2024). How to create a transformation that lasts. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2024/how-to-create-a-transformation-that-lasts

    Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

    Fayol, H. (2013). General and industrial management. Martino Fine Books. (Original work published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Paris, 1916; translated and republished by IEEE, 1960)

    Flynn, S. I. (2024). Transformational and transactional leadership. EBSCO Research Starters. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/transformational-and-transactional-leadership

    Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness (25th anniversary ed.). Paulist Press. (Original work published 1977)

    Heifetz, R. A. (1998). Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press.

    Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Harvard Business Review Press.

    Hiatt, J. M. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci Learning Center Publications.

    Hiatt, J., & Creasey, T. (2012). Change management: The people side of change (2nd ed.). Prosci Learning Center Publications.

    Keller, S., & Schaninger, B. (2020). How do we manage the change journey? McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/how-do-we-manage-the-change-journey

    Khattak, S. I., Ali, M. I., Khan, M. A., & Kakar, A. S. (2025). Does digital leadership capability, knowledge management capability, and organizational agility foster digital transformation in China? A time-lagged survey-based assessment in digital transformation projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2025.101873

    Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1995/05/leading-change-why-transformation-efforts-fail-2

    Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.

    Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change, With a new preface by the author. Harvard Business Review Press.

    Kotter, J. P., Akhtar, V., & Gupta, G. (2021). Change: How organizations achieve hard-to-imagine results in uncertain and volatile times. Wiley.

    Koudriachov, C., Tam, C., & Aparicio, M. (2025). Success with Agile Project Management: Looking back and into the future. Journal of Systems and Software, 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.112428

    Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; Social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103

    Litre, P., & Murphy, K. (2013). Results Delivery: Managing the highs and lows of change. Bain & Company. https://www.bain.com/insights/results-delivery-managing-the-highs-and-lows-of-change/

    Litre, P., Michels, D., Hindshaw, I., & Ghosh, P. (2018). Results Delivery®: Busting three common myths of change management. Bain & Company. https://www.bain.com/insights/results-delivery-busting-3-common-change-management-myths/

    Mankins, M., & Litre, P. (2024). Transformations that work: Lessons from companies that are defying the odds. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2024/05/transformations-that-work

    Michels, D. (2022). There are two ways to manage organizational change: One is easy, the other is better. Bain & Company. https://www.bain.com/insights/there-are-two-ways-to-manage-organizational-change-one-is-easy-the-other-is-better-infographic/

    Mouazen, A. M., Hernández-Lara, A. B., Abdallah, F., Ramadan, M., Chahine, J., Baydoun, H., & Bou Zakhem, N. (2024). Transformational and transactional leaders and their role in implementing the Kotter change management model ensuring sustainable change: An empirical study. Sustainability, 16(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010016

    Porter, M. E. (2004). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance (Reprint ed.). Free Press. (Original work published 1985)

    Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.

    Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Revised and updated ed.). Doubleday.

    Taylor, F. W. (2013). The principles of scientific management. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. (Original work published by Harper Brothers, 1911)

    Vale, S. L., Said, M., Smith, J., Joshi, P., & Loh, R. K. S. (2022). Welcome back Kotter - Developing a National Allergy Strategy for Australia. World Allergy Organization Journal, 15(11), Article 100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100706

    Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation (Rev. and updated ed.). Free Press.

    Yi, Z. (2025). Chapter two - Change management models and approaches. In Change management in information organizations (pp. 25–92). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91237-2.00009-9

    Avisos

    2025-07-10

    Nuevo número publicado

    Ver más

    Becas

    es

    Buscar documentos

    Enviar un artículo

    La editorial MLS Journals acepta envíos en inglés, español y portugués.

    Patrocinado por:

    Logo Funiber
    Logo UNINI
    Logo UNEAT
    Logo UNIB
    Logo unincol
    Logo unidc
    Logo Romana
    Logo PM
    EU Flag

    Contacto

    Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Cantabria. C/Isabel Torres 21.

    39011 Santander, España.

    © 2025 Multi-Lingual Scientific (MLS) Journals. Todos los derechos reservados. | Política de privacidad | Transparencia | Proyectos | Noticias