ayamtoto ayamtoto
|

Menú

  • Revistas
  • Quiénes somos
  • Proceso editorial
Revistas
Quiénes somos
Proceso editorial
  • Registrarse
  • Acceder
  • |
    es
    en English pt_PT Português
    MLSER

    Promovido por:

    Logo Funiber
    Logo UNINI Logo UNEAT
    Logo UNIB Logo unincol
    Logo unidc Logo Romana
    Logo PM Logo UNEAT
    Logo UNINI
    Logo UNEAT
    Logo UNIB
    Logo unincol
    Logo unidc
    Logo Romana
    Logo PM
    • Actual
    • Archivos
    • Acerca de
      • Acerca de
      • Equipo editorial
      • Revisores
      • Estadísticas
    • Envíos
    • Indexación
    • Contacto

    Lectura en voz alta virtual versus lectura silenciosa: Efectos en la comprensión lectora en educación media

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.29314/8xz4hx95

    Maria Pearsall

    International Iberoamerican University UNINIMX ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1696-9604

    Almitra Medina

    East Carolina University ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-2753

    Formatos Disponibles

    PDF

    es

    Resumen

    Este estudio exploratorio examinó el impacto de dos condiciones de lectura en la comprensión de estudiantes de sexto grado. El objetivo fue determinar si la participación virtual en una intervención de lectura en voz alta se asociaba con diferencias en la comprensión lectora en comparación con la lectura silenciosa. Los participantes fueron asignados a una de las dos condiciones. La comprensión lectora entre condiciones se evaluó mediante un pretest y un posttest. El pretest estableció los niveles iniciales, mientras que el posttest evaluó la lectura independiente de nuevos fragmentos del texto. Los datos se analizaron mediante una prueba independiente t para examinar las ganancias de comprensión y un análisis de covarianza (ANCOVA) para evaluar las diferencias en el postest controlando las puntuaciones iniciales. Los resultados no mostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las condiciones de lectura, ni en los cambios de la media entre grupos ni después de controlar las diferencias iniciales. Sin embargo, se observó un tamaño de efecto práctico grande entre los grupos con la prueba t , favoreciendo la lectura en voz alta. Esto sugiere que la intervención puede tener importancia educativa a pesar de la falta de significancia estadística. La naturaleza exploratoria del estudio y el reducido tamaño de la muestra sugieren la necesidad de continuar investigando el potencial impacto de estas modalidades de lectura en muestras más amplias y diversas. Los hallazgos contribuyen a la literatura sobre lecturas en voz alta y la alfabetización en la escuela media y ofrecen implicaciones para investigaciones futuras.


    Descargas

    Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

    Estadísticas


    Cómo citar

    • ACM
    • ACS
    • APA
    • ABNT
    • Chicago
    • Harvard
    • IEEE
    • MLA
    • Turabian
    • Vancouver
    • AMA
    Lectura en voz alta virtual versus lectura silenciosa: Efectos en la comprensión lectora en educación media. (n.d.). MLS Educational Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.29314/8xz4hx95
    EndNote Zotero Mendeley
    Descargar .ris
    EndNote
    Descargar .bib

    Citas

    Ariail, M., & Albright, L. K. (2006). A survey of teachers’ read-aloud practices in middle schools. Reading Research & Instruction, 45(2), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070609558443

    Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Text Talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55(1), 10–20.

    Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44

    Brabham, E. G., & Lynch-Brown, C. (2002). Effects of teacher’s reading aloud styles on vocabulary comprehension in the early elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.465

    Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill.

    Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (20082). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). International Reading Association

    Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

    Flippo, R., Gehsmann, K., & Halladay, J. (2021). Assessing readers: Qualitative assessment and student-centered instruction (3rd ed.). Routledge.

    Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4

    Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

    Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and Reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

    Hale, A. D., Skinner, C. H., Williams, J., Hawkins, R., Neddenriep, C. E., & Dizer, J. (2007). Comparing comprehension following silent and aloud reading across elementary and secondary students: Implication for curriculum-based measurement. Behavior Analyst Today, 8(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100101

    Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). “Just plain reading”: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 350–377. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.4.2

    Kindle, K. J. (2010). Vocabulary development during read-alouds: Examining the instructional sequence. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 14(1/2), 65–88.

    Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163

    Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.

    Laminack, L. (2016). The ultimate read-aloud resource: Making every moment intentional and instructional with best friend books. Scholastic

    McGee, L. M., & Schickedanz, J. A. (2007). Repeated interactive read-alouds in preschool and kindergarten. Reading Teacher, 60(8), 742–751. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.60.8.4

    Marchessault, J., & Larwin, K. (2014). The potential impact of structured read-aloud on middle school reading achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 3(3), 187-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v3i3.6463

    Muñoz-Najar, A., Gilberto, A., Hasan, A., Cobo, C., Azevedo, J. P., & Akmal, M. (2021). Remote learning during COVID-19: Lessons from today, principles for tomorrow. World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/160271637074230077

    National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2022). Learning contexts, opportunities, and perspectives: The nation’s report card. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading/survey-questionnaires?grade=4 - learning-contexts-opportunities-and-perspectives

    Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford University Press.

    Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K. K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A. S. (1995). Data from NAEP's integrated reading performance record (IRPR) at grade 4 (NCES 95-762). National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs95/web/95762.asp

    Prior, S. M., Fenwick, K. D., Saunders, K. S., Ouellette, R., O’Quinn, C., & Harvey, S. (2011). Comprehension After Oral and Silent Reading: Does Grade Level Matter? Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2010.497202

    Reed, D., Swanson, E., Petscher, Y., & Vaughn, S. (2014). The effects of teacher read-alouds and student silent reading on predominantly bilingual high school seniors’ learning and retention of social studies content. Reading & Writing, 27(7), 1119–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9478-8

    Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.

    Santoro, L. E., Chard, D. J., Howard, L., & Baker, S. K. (2008). Making the very most of classroom read-alouds to promote comprehension and vocabulary. Reading Teacher, 61(5), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.4

    Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101

    Shanahan, T., Mallette, M., & Barone, D. (2016). Shanahan on literacy. Reading Teacher, 69(6), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1456

    Snow, C. E., & Biancarosa, G. (2003). Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here? Carnegie Corporation of New York. https://www.carnegie.org/publications/adolescent-literacy-and-the-achievement-gap-what-do-we-know-and-where-do-we-go-from-here/

    Stoetzel, L., & Shedrow, S. J. (2021). Making the move online: Interactive read‐alouds for the virtual classroom. Reading Teacher, 74(6), 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2006

    Trelease, J. (2013). The read-aloud handbook (7th ed.). Penguin Books.

    van den Broek, P., White, M. J., Kendeou, P., & Carlson, S.(2009). Reading between the lines. Developmental and individual differences in cognitive processes in reading comprehension. In R. Wagner, C. Schatschneider, & C. Phythian-Sence (Eds.), Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 107–123). The Guilford Press.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    Wasik, B. A., & Hindman, A. H. (2011). Promoting vocabulary development and content knowledge in preschool children. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 396–409). Guilford Press.

    Webb, S., Massey, D., Goggans, M., & Flajole, K. (2019). Thirty‐five years of the gradual release of responsibility: Scaffolding toward complex and responsive teaching. Reading Teacher, 73(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1799

    Avisos

    2025-04-12

    Nueva versión OJS

    Ver más

    Sistema Antiplagio

    Becas

    es es

    Buscar documentos

    Enviar un artículo

    La editorial MLS Journals acepta envíos en inglés, español y portugués.

    QA QA

    Indexación

    Sistema Antiplagio

    Promovido por:

    Logo Funiber
    Logo UNINI
    Logo UNEAT
    Logo UNIB
    Logo unincol
    Logo unidc
    Logo Romana
    Logo PM
    EU Flag

    Contacto

    Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Cantabria. C/Isabel Torres 21.

    39011 Santander, España.

    © 2026 Multi-Lingual Scientific (MLS) Journals. Todos los derechos reservados. | Política de privacidad | Transparencia | Proyectos | Noticias